[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org mode and Emacs
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Org mode and Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:32:14 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> Yes, that's the idea behind using one-char constructs for basic inline
> markup (eg ~code~, /emphasis/, etc.) and two-chars constructs for more
> specific inline markup (eg ~~defn~~, =~defvar~=, etc.).
I forsee a problem with this approach: users will be compelled to study
and memorize dozens of two character combinations that closely resemble
one another. Contrast this to Texinfo, where:
The key sequence @kbd{C-x C-f}
The string @samp{"sample text"}
The function @code{defun}
The formula @var{X}
An @dfn{example}
leaves no latitude for visual ambiguity, whereas it will not take much
for one to mistake =~ for -~ or ~~.
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Bastien Guerry, 2023/08/30
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/08/26
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/27
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/08/27
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/28
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Yuri Khan, 2023/08/28
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/28
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Bastien Guerry, 2023/08/30
- Re: Org mode and Emacs,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Org mode and Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2023/08/26