[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emac
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:17:48 +0200 |
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> I looked at APEL, and its code was near identical to what I (with help
> from PK) wrote. I'd have nothing against the name static-if instead.
> As long as this doesn't raise copyright assignment problems, assuming
> the authors of APEL haven't assigned copyright to the FSF.
I think it's fine as far as copyright goes. You came up with your
version independently, before even looking at their code. We even
have a public record of that right here on this list. IANAL, but the
name `static-if' in itself is also not copyrightable, AFAIU.
- Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp?, (continued)
Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp?, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/08/29
Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp?, Stefan Kangas, 2023/08/29
Re: Why shouldn't we have a #if .... #else .... #endif construct in Emacs Lisp?, LdBeth, 2023/08/29