[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type
From: |
sbaugh |
Subject: |
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Oct 2023 11:55:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: sbaugh@catern.com
>> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 16:05:11 -0400
>>
>> Yes, agreed. Taking inspiration from zcomplete, I wrote this patch to
>> provide just this feature, thoughts?
>
> I tried this. The update is slow (most probably because it works off
> the post-command-hook), and the UX is therefore extremely unpleasant
> if you type fast enough.
Interesting. Can you say more about what completion you're doing for
which the update is slow? I would have expected the while-no-input to
cause the update to not block you if you type fast.
Of course, if there are optimizations that need to be done for
completion-generation, I'm happy to do them.
>> +(defcustom completions-auto-update t
>> + "If non-nil, update the *Completions* buffer as you type.
>
> Thus _must_ be nil by default.
Of course, just defaulted to t to make testing the patch easier.
>> +(defconst completions-no-auto-update-commands
>> + '(previous-history-element
>> + next-history-element
>> + previous-line-or-history-element
>> + next-line-or-history-element
>> + completion-at-point
>> + minibuffer-complete-and-exit
>> + minibuffer-force-complete-and-exit
>> + minibuffer-next-completion
>> + minibuffer-previous-completion
>> + minibuffer-choose-completion)
>> + "Commands to skip updating *Completions*")
>
> Why are those excluded? And why is this a defconst, not a defvar or
> defcustom?
These are basically just commands where it would be annoying or
pointless to do an auto-update.
There are three classes here:
1. completion-at-point
minibuffer-complete-and-exit
minibuffer-force-complete-and-exit
These commands themselves update *Completions*, so it's not necessary
to update *Completions* immediately after they run, since it will
already be up to date for the buffer text.
This is just a performance thing and isn't strictly necessary. I'll
drop them from the next version.
(The performance optimization could be implemented separately from
completions-auto-update and apply even if it was nil. We could have
a general mechanism to skip regeneration of completions if the
completion input hasn't changed. That could be nice, although it's a
complex topic.)
2. previous-history-element
next-history-element
previous-line-or-history-element
next-line-or-history-element
minibuffer-choose-completion
These insert some text in the minibuffer which usually (but not
always) will only have one completion.
I'll drop these from the next version of my patch, since actually I
now realize there's no reason to special-case skipping these.
3. minibuffer-next-completion
minibuffer-previous-completion
These call next-completion, which changes the location of point in
*Completions*. And if we auto-update *Completions*, we lose the
location of point.
But actually, even without completions-auto-update, it would be
generally useful to not lose the location of point in *Completions*.
So I'll just implement that as a separate patch. And then I can also
drop these two special cases.
So, in the next version of my patch, this variable will be dropped
entirely.
>> + (while-no-input
>> + (let ((non-essential t))
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Why?
This I borrowed from zcomplete. It seems sensible, since
non-essential's docstring says:
E.g., it can be used to prevent Tramp from prompting the user for a
password when we are [...] displaying possible completions before the
user even asked for it.
>> + (when (and (get-buffer-window "*Completions*" 0)
>> + (not (memq this-command
>> completions-no-auto-update-commands)))
>> + (redisplay)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> Why do you need this?
post-command-hook's docstring says:
It is a bad idea to use this hook for expensive processing. If
unavoidable, wrap your code in ‘(while-no-input (redisplay) CODE)’ to
avoid making Emacs unresponsive while the user types.
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Juri Linkov, 2023/10/13
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Spencer Baugh, 2023/10/14
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Juri Linkov, 2023/10/14
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, sbaugh, 2023/10/15
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/15
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type,
sbaugh <=
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/10/16
- Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Michael Albinus, 2023/10/16
- RE: [External] : Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Drew Adams, 2023/10/16
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, sbaugh, 2023/10/16
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Juri Linkov, 2023/10/17
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Spencer Baugh, 2023/10/18
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Juri Linkov, 2023/10/15
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2023/10/16
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Juri Linkov, 2023/10/17
Re: Updating *Completions* as you type, Eshel Yaron, 2023/10/15