Re: Native compilation on as default?

[Stefan Kangas]

Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:

> Thinking about this...  IME *the* warning we are interested in from the
> async compilation is the:
>
> "the function ‘xxx’ is not known to be defined."
>
> This because typically xxx is not a function but a macro and is unknown
> due to a missing require, the file end-up misscompiled and not
> functional.

What is it specifically that makes this into a separate issue for the
native-compiler?  Shouldn't the byte-compiler also warn about a
situation like that?