|
From: | Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: | Re: What's missing in ELisp that makes people want to use cl-lib? |
Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:44:56 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes: > AFTER loading it > > ... The magnitude of the difference when additional methods are defined I find surprising. I take it as a strong indicator that cl-generic.el indeed works completely differently than PCL. Assuming it is not a bug af some sort. That the manual nowhere uses the term "discriminating function" might also be a hint.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |