[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:57:49 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Would you like to help design matching functions to do the same jobs
> > that pcase does?
> With pleasure, I'll try to do my best.
Thank you.
> > I would like to make it possible to combine various matching and
> > destructuring functions using `and' and `or' (plus any other Lisp
> > functions you like).
> Would this still be based on pcase or be something completely new?
It would become part of the cond* idea that I previously posted the
first draft of. I posted a newer version today.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Instead of pcase, (continued)
Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/16
Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/19
Re: Instead of pcase, Spencer Baugh, 2023/11/16
combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Richard Stallman, 2023/11/17
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/19
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Gerd Möllmann, 2023/11/19
- Re: combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/19