[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 21:53:32 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > I could not fully make sense of the first one: I don't understand
> > what you intend it to do, or what you think it might do, or why it
> > might do that.
> Yes, that is part of the point I am making: that the way COND* binds
> variables and passes them to predicate forms is confusing.
For me, what is confusing is the rest of those examples,
such as the use of subroutines called `bar' which do various
things that you didn't explain.
If you tell me what you are trying to do in each case, I could
show you examples of how to do it in a simple way with cond*.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: cond*, (continued)
- Re: cond*, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/20
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/15
- Re: Instead of pcase, Adam Porter, 2023/12/16
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/19
- Re: Instead of pcase, Adam Porter, 2023/12/20
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/22
- Re: Instead of pcase, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/12/25
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/26
- Re: Instead of pcase, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/12/28
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/29
- Re: Instead of pcase,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/12
- Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/10