Re: Unhelpful text in C-h v search-default-mode

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:50:42 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:12:49 +0200
> > 
> > 0. emacs -Q
> > 1. M-x list-timers
> > 
> >    *     0.1s     t show-paren-function
> >    *     0.5s     t #<subr 
> > F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_13>
> > 
> > I wonder how users are supposed to know what function it is?
> > Searching by the delay number 0.5 reveals this lambda comes from
> > 
> >         (setq jit-lock-context-timer
> >               (run-with-idle-timer jit-lock-context-time t
> >                                    (lambda ()
> >                                      (unless jit-lock--antiblink-grace-timer
> >                                        (jit-lock-context-fontify)))))
> > 
> 
> What happens with that in a build without native-compilation? does
> what list-timers shows in that case look more friendly?

Answering my own question:

               0.2s         0.5s blink-cursor-timer-function
   *           0.1s            t show-paren-function
   *           0.5s      :repeat blink-cursor-start
   *           0.5s            t #f(compiled-function () #<bytecode 
0x12cdf98f4135684a> [jit-lock--antiblink-grace-timer jit-lock-context-fontify])

So are you saying that #<bytecode 0x12cdf98f4135684a> is friendlier
than #<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_13>?
If so, please explain how is it friendlier.