[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: outline-minor-mode: Did something change
From: |
T.V Raman |
Subject: |
Re: outline-minor-mode: Did something change |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:09:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
"T.V Raman" <raman@google.com> writes:
Only think to add: could we have a half-way house solution that at least
for a while uses both ie outline-level and outline-regexp?
> Thanks!
>
> Using headers is the right idea an the regexp is a hack, but sadly
> the entire Web is a hack that forgot the meaning of structure a long,
> long time ago!
>
> Juri Linkov writes:
> > > Answering my own question after the previous message pointed out the
> > > change in eww:
> > >
> > > Adding
> > > (setq outline-level 'outline-level outline-search-function nil)
> > >
> > > Restored the behavior I lost
> > > but I dont understand how that commit which adding the shr-specific
> > > searcher broke it.
> >
> > The new function shr-outline-search doesn't use outline-regexp.
> > It searches for the text property 'outline-level' that the function
> > 'shr-heading' puts on HTML headers. Then it makes outline headings
> > only on the lines with HTML headers. This is a more reliable way
> > than using a regexp.
> >
> > However, if you want to make outlines with a specific regexp
> > what you already did is the right way to do this.
--