Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>>   <tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:22:12PM +0900, Psionic K wrote:
>> I only just caught Stefan's presentation on Emacs development
>> https://toobnix.org/w/m4XmrmE9Geat54AKT1RQaH

> [...]

>> While these web 2.0 style services have their own drawbacks for
>> communication that have become more clear in their 20 years of
>> evolution, the better systems are currently under development and we
>> should direct attention toward making better things rather than
>> applying friction to each other over the drawbacks of these soon-to-be
>> ancient web 2.0 platforms [...]

> You align things along a "worse...better" line, but let me say
> that this valuation corresponds to your opinion, which I do
> respect but I don't share at all.

> For me, a good mail workflow is way better than any of the Web 2.0
> alternatives available (and yes, I do have experience with Gitlab).

I agree completely. When I have to deal with gitlab/github issues (which
can be done partially by email), I have the feeling of a huge step
backwards.

Maybe if there were a sophisticated emacs interface for these
gitlab/github-issus, things might be different but right now, I find it
too restricted and to clumsy to use.
> Cheers

-- 
I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. 
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature