[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Excessive use of `eassert`
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Excessive use of `eassert` |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:04:47 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:35:53 -0500
>
> Building with ENABLE_CHECKING results in an Emacs that's
> substantially slower. To some extent, this is unavoidable, but
>
> cd .../src
> rm process.o
> make CFLAGS="-Winline -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H" process.o |&
> grep make_lisp_symbol
>
> shows that `make_lisp_symbol` is not inlined, so NILP(x) ends up being
> an actual function call to a function calling another function ....
> which I think is definitely in the "excessive" camp :-)
I'm not sure I follow. Can you elaborate? Are you saying that the
assertion causes make_lisp_symbol not to be inlined? And what
functions are called by NILP?
> The patch below seems to address this specific issue, tho I haven't
> measured its performance impact yet.
Is this specifically about NILP? Or are there other situations where
this assertion slows us down considerably. I wouldn't want to drop
this assertion so summarily, if possible.
Thanks.
- Excessive use of `eassert`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/01/18
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/01/19
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/19
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`, Paul Eggert, 2024/01/20
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/21
- Re: Excessive use of `eassert`, Paul Eggert, 2024/01/21