Re: pcase bindings in patterns with complicated logic

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > My question was whether cond* can be used to implement an equivalent
  > match as in my example above.

The `or' pattern should do that job.
In what way is it not sufficient?

                                  AFAIU, cond* cannot match against multiple
  > values at once.

With the natural meaning, yes it can.  Perhaps we are miscommunicating.
Could you explain what "match against multiple values at once" means to you?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)