emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy


From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 13:20:51 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

>>> The original was inconsistent on this,
>> Maybe that was an oversight.
>> Do you remember which inconsistency you had noticed in this respect?
> I remember (symbol-with-pos symbol atom) (symbol atom), there might have
> been others.

I think I see.  By "leaf" I really meant "non abstract": both `symbol`
and `symbol-with-pos` describe *the* type of some objects (IOW `type-of`
can return that symbol), as opposed to things like `sequence`, `list`,
atom`, `number-or-marker`, ...

> This generates as 'cl--typeof-types':
>
> ((subr-primitive subr function atom)
>  (subr-native-elisp subr function atom)
>  (module-function function atom)
>  (byte-code-function compiled-function function atom)
>  (cons list sequence)
>  (null list sequence boolean symbol atom)
>  (string array sequence atom)
>  (char-table array sequence atom)
>  (bool-vector array sequence atom)
>  (vector array sequence atom)
>  (keyword symbol-with-pos symbol atom)
>  (fixnum integer number number-or-marker integer-or-marker atom)
>  (bignum integer number number-or-marker integer-or-marker atom)
>  (marker number-or-marker integer-or-marker atom)
>  (float number number-or-marker atom)
>  (obarray atom)
>  (overlay atom)
>  (window-configuration atom)
>  (process atom)
>  (window atom)
>  (buffer atom)
>  (frame atom)
>  (hash-table atom)
>  (terminal atom)
>  (thread atom)
>  (mutex atom)
>  (condvar atom)
>  (font-spec atom)
>  (font-entity atom)
>  (font-object atom)
>  (user-ptr atom)
>  (tree-sitter-parser atom)
>  (tree-sitter-node atom)
>  (tree-sitter-compiled-query atom)
>  (structure atom)
>  (class atom))
>
> Which looks okay to me at a first glance, but make check explodes 🤷...

I see that `symbol` is missing there.  Don't know if that's why it
explodes, OTOH.

Better keep a few extra useless entries in there.


        Stefan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]