Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it

[Andrea Corallo]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> We do have types for them, but they're not built-in.
>>> There's `cl--class`, `cl-structure-object`, `cl-structure-class`, and
>>> some others I can't remember for EIEIO.
>> Just to make sure we agree, what's the definition of built-in type?
>
> It's a pragmatic definition: `cl--typeof-types` is there to deal with
> those types which aren't properly described by a `cl--class` symbol property.

I see, but I'm not thinking to the content of `cl--typeof-types`.  I'm
thinking to the representation we generate for our doc with the type
hierarchy.  I'm wondering if we should include `cl--class`,
`cl-structure-object`, `cl-structure-class` as built-in types.

Bests

  Andrea