Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it

[Stefan Monnier]

> I see, but I'm not thinking to the content of `cl--typeof-types`.  I'm
> thinking to the representation we generate for our doc with the type
> hierarchy.  I'm wondering if we should include `cl--class`,
> `cl-structure-object`, `cl-structure-class` as built-in types.

I guess it would make sense to include parts of the
struct/EIEIO/OClosure hierarchy for people to understand how they fit
alongside the "builtin" part, indeed.


        Stefan