[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Declaring Lisp function types
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Declaring Lisp function types |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:54:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Like I said: searching for symbols of a programming language
> is not a good idea. It is not efficient, and thus not
> useful. So this aspect is simply not relevant to the issue
> at hand.
Oh, people do that all the time, from inside and outside of
Emacs. There are many use cases for that, from finding what
caused error messages to simply navigating a buffer, and
many others.
So he has a point, it just that such concerns probably
shouldn't be what determines how the syntax of a language
looks. If "function" is the best way to describe it, it
probably is and that it will be hard(er) to find with certain
methods, well, that can't be helped.
But instead of arguing about people's workflows, let's just
put all suggestions on the table and have a look.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, (continued)
Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Tomas Hlavaty, 2024/03/15
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Tomas Hlavaty, 2024/03/16
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/16
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Tomas Hlavaty, 2024/03/16
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/16
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Lele Gaifax, 2024/03/18
- Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Emanuel Berg, 2024/03/16
Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Adam Porter, 2024/03/15
Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/26
Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2024/03/26
Re: Declaring Lisp function types, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/26