[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing cond* in core
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Installing cond* in core |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:15:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> > Then I don't understand what's the intended semantics: how can you use
> > PAT's bindings over ALWAYS when PAT failed to match?
> It makes bindings for all the variables it could bind, independent of
> which ones matched in a given case.
I don't understand, sorry. Can you give some examples?
> pcase does that to, I found out by experiment.
Same here. Are you referring to cases such as
(pcase EXP
((or `(,a ,b)
5)
(BODY)))
where `a` and `b` will be bound to nil when EXP evaluates to 5?
Stefan
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/03/12
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/03/15
- Re: Installing cond* in core,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/03/17
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/17
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Peter Hull, 2024/03/19
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Richard Stallman, 2024/03/20
- Re: Installing cond* in core, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/20