Re: Installing cond* in core

[Stefan Monnier]

> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>   > does that mean that the semantics you provide is in ALWAYS, the vars
>   > bound by PAT are bound to the matched values when PAT did match and they
>   > are all bound to nil otherwise?
>
> That is what makes sense, and that is what I think the code does.

OK, so it "behaves the same" as what Pcase does for `(or PAT _)`.
The semantics sounds fine, then and would be easy enough to reproduce with 
Pcase.
I wonder how often this :no-exit form is useful, tho.


        Stefan