Re: Q about staticvec declaration

[Gerd Möllmann]

On 27.03.24 13:54, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 27 mars 2024 kl. 13.15 skrev Gerd Möllmann
> <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>:
>
> > What I meant to ask is why are the Lisp_Objects considered const
> > when viewed through staticvec.
>
> Oh, I see. No idea, but it's not obvious that all static roots are
> free game for a moving GC (for example, there could be other
> references that expect the static roots to remain unchanged for all I
> know).

Yes, that's what I'm trying to understand, if there is something that 
depends on that. Without success, so far.

But it could also be a mistake, of course. Something like "const *" 
where "* const" was meant. Who knows...