[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS experiment successful
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
Re: MPS experiment successful |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:14:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> That's all. There is nothing more. And I'm currently undecided how to
>>> proceed with this.
>>
>> The next step would be to push a feature branch into the Emacs Git
>> repository and let people try the branch on the other supported
>> platforms. If the code is not yet mature enough for that, please
>> suggest how to get from here to there.
>
> I think technically it could be done, but there are some things that
> would need to be done. From the top of my head:
>
> - CL packages vs. obarrays (I do have packages but no obarrays)
> - Handling of pure space
> - Handling the new JSON stuff, which I don't have in my branch, I think.
> - ...
>
> And then of course the general work of getting a branch from a what is
> basically a fork back to the forked repo, which I'm not so sure how to
> go about that.
>
> But my undecidedness comes more from what could come after that. I'm not
> sure how willing I am to invest what can be years to get things
> finished, esp. if no one else starts working on it. Had that one time
> too often in the 90s, some might remember ;-).
>
>> Would you like to describe in a few words what would be the advantages
>> and disadvantages of this GC for Emacs?
>
> Advantages for users:
>
> For the user it means the final end to GC pauses. MPS runs in a
> different thread wich can be in a different core.
>
> What MPS means for the overall speed of Emacs I find impossible to say.
> MPS doesn't seem to be slow at all though, although some slowdown can be
> expected in the client because of thread-safe allocations.
>
> Example for a confusing fact that I noticed today:
>
> Full build without MPS, -O0, checking
>
> real 26:20.01
> user 1:32:15.54
> sys 3:20.74
>
> Same build with debug MPS (-lmps-debug)
>
> real 14:07.90
> user 44:17.94
> sys 3:15.99
>
> That's on an 2,3 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, 16G RAM, SSD. 🤷
Hi Gerd,
sounds very interesting. I think we'll need more performance figures
especially on non debug builds in the future to better undesrtand this.
OTOH even in case it proves to be a tiny bit slower having no pauses is
a big plus.
Andrea
- Re: MPS experiment successful, (continued)
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/17
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/17
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/17
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/04/17
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/18
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/18
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/18
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/18
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/04/17
- Re: MPS experiment successful, Gerd Möllmann, 2024/04/18
- Re: MPS experiment successful,
Andrea Corallo <=
Message not available
Message not available