[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windm
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:12:59 +0000 |
> >> Why not just set up the keybindings by default and autoload the package
> when the bindings are invoked? That's the friction minimizing option. We
> don't have to change any bindings installed by the current windmove code.
> > I think this is too drastic, that's why. The package is not loaded by
> > default now. Let's first change the key bindings that become in
> > effect when the package is loaded, and consider doing that by default
> > only if the package becomes popular enough.
>
> The whole concept of autoloads is deferring the loading of packages
> until they are used. And it's a good one, saving on loading time and
> used memory.
>
> We can just add bindings for those commands (which are autoloaded), no
> further changes necessary.
Just because you want to use some feature, so
you load its package, that doesn't imply that
you also want to add a bunch of global key
bindings.
Loading is one choice/option. Adding some key
bindings for some of its commands is another,
additional choice/option.
It's possible, but not necessary, to couple the
two. Why do so, and especially, why do so as
soon as the library is added to Emacs?
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/23
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/23
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Drew Adams <=
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/23
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/24
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/06/23