[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 07:44:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On June 26, 2024 7:23:38 AM EDT, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Bryant <jb@jeremybryant.net>
>> Cc: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>, dancol@dancol.org, acm@muc.de,
>> stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:26:47 +0100
>>
>> 1.
>> I also find that C-x 4 is indeed logical, which makes it easier to remember
>>
>> 2.
>> C-x 4 .. works on the terminal/console. This is important for
>> preserving functionality of Emacs.
>
>I still hope that someone will tell what is exactly the request here,
>given that windmove-mode is on by default and its commands are
>autoloaded.
To be clear, my proposal is to bind C-x 4 <arrow> in the default global keymap
to the corresponding directional windmove commands and to bind the shifted
versions of these keys to the state swapping versions of these movement
commands. IOW, in emacs -Q, C-x 4 LEFT should move left.
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Gregor Zattler, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Gregor Zattler, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Joel Reicher, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Petteri Hintsanen, 2024/06/24
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Jeremy Bryant, 2024/06/25
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Hovav Shacham, 2024/06/28
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/28
- Re: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/29
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Kangas, 2024/06/30
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/26