Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx

[Po Lu]

Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu> writes:

> On 6/24/2024 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 6/23/2024 4:25 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 6/23/2024 5:16 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>>>>> I pushed changes to load functions defined in UNICOWS.DLL from that DLL
>>>>> on Windows 9X systems, and other adjustments affecting USP10,
>>>>> globals_of_w32 and ReadDirectoryChangesW to scratch/windows-98.  It is
>>>>> possible that they should impact the Cygwin build, which I can't test.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, would you please arrange that this message fall on the right
>>>>> ears for the contents of the branch to be tested in this configuration?
>>>>
>>>> That would be Ken and Corwin, I believe.
>>>
>>> Builds fine on Cygwin.
>> Sorry, I spoke too soon.  Without thinking, I did the default (GTK3)
>> build, which is what I always do.  Obviously I should have done the
>> Cygwin-w32 build (configure option --with-w32).  I've done that now,
>> and the build fails as follows:
>>    CC       w32uniscribe.o
>> ../../src/w32uniscribe.c: In function ‘syms_of_w32uniscribe_for_pdumper’:
>> ../../src/w32uniscribe.c:1577:20: error: ‘uniscribe’ undeclared
>> (first use in this function); did you mean ‘Quniscribe’?
>>   1577 |     get_proc_addr (uniscribe, "ScriptGetFontScriptTags");
>>        |                    ^~~~~~~~~
>>        |                    Quniscribe
>> ../../src/w32uniscribe.c:1577:20: note: each undeclared identifier
>> is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> make[2]: *** [Makefile:457: w32uniscribe.o] Error 1
>
> I guess the problem is pretty obvious.  You just have to move "#ifdef
> WINDOWSNT" at line 1541 down a few lines.
>
> Ken

Please try again.