Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Kangas wrote:

>> You can get good results if you discuss the possibilities
>> and capabilities of a library with the developers of calc.
>> And do some work with them. You will be doing a generic
>> mathematical library anyway. Is there a good reason why an
>> association with them is so terrible ? Have you worked with
>> them before ?
>
> FYI, we basically don't have any active "calc developers" to
> talk to. There are some people that occasionally contribute
> here and there though, see "git log lisp/calc".

Okay, that bad.

Well, this is another example why that model isn't good.
When people stop working on a program, no one is working on
the libraries anymore either.

Solution: Decouple.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal