Re: Adding a generic mathematical library

[Emanuel Berg]

Christopher Dimech wrote:

> You do not need a unified way to representing a vector.
> You only need the tool to work conveniently with vectors.
> Having two or three ways to do it, is not a bad thing,
> unless the number of ways are excessive.

For the purpose of the library normalizing that can be
a good idea.

It is not a bad thing to have several ways to do things, but
in Lisp they also tend to do several things each depending on
context. So it is a m*n curve. A lot of Lisp project gets out
of hand with complexity, this is perhaps not the main reason
but it is one of them.

So if one can stick to a subset methods and a consistent style
at least for one file it is good :)

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal