[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adding a generic mathematical library
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Adding a generic mathematical library |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:53:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> It seems to me that writing a generic mathematical library
> is not very hard, but writing a good one requires a lot of
> experience and understanding of how suc a library could be
> used. The obvious solutions are clunky, but what makes for
> a good kibrary is a solution that is elegant.
On the contrary, I think our library would have been great.
We could have taken a look at other programming languages and
see what they have, for example.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, (continued)
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Richard Stallman, 2024/07/29
- Adding a generic mathematical library, Christopher Dimech, 2024/07/30
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Emanuel Berg, 2024/07/30
- Adding a generic mathematical library, Christopher Dimech, 2024/07/30
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Emanuel Berg, 2024/07/30
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/07/31
- Re: Adding a generic mathematical library,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Christopher Dimech, 2024/07/27
Re: Adding a generic mathematical library, Emanuel Berg, 2024/07/28