[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS: Win64 testers?
From: |
Quang Kien Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: MPS: Win64 testers? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:44:09 -0700 |
> What ProcExp64 shows is a good sign, but I'd prefer to test also some
> redirection like above, with Emacs and the sub-process both writing to
> the same stdout/stderr stream, which would allow to verify positively
> that they write to different places.
Okay, I have tested with this lisp exp:
(print 10 #'external-debugging-output)
10 is printed in the stdout/stderr on the console.
Then try again with
(start-process-shell-command "test" nil "emacs -Q --batch --eval
\"(print 123123 #'external-debugging-output)\"")
The child emacs process is spinned up but nothing is spewed to the
current console
output. Does that correct and prove that they don't share the handle?
----
Kien
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, (continued)
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/06
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/07
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/08
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/08
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?,
Quang Kien Nguyen <=
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/09
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/09
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/09
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/09
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/13
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/13
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Pip Cet, 2024/08/13
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/13
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/08/13
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Quang Kien Nguyen, 2024/08/14