[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MPS: Win64 testers?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: MPS: Win64 testers? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Sep 2024 11:43:58 +0300 |
> From: Kien Nguyen <kien.n.quang@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 01:21:29 -0700
> Cc: Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> yantar92@posteo.net
>
> By the way, instead of running Emacs under gdb all the time, I figured
> out that I can just attach to the `emacs_abort` dialog with a small fix
> to ensure the keyboard hook is released beforehand. The patch for that
> is here[1]. @Eli, do you think that's acceptable to merge? It greatly
> relieves the burden of using with debugging Emacs on Windows.
I'm not sure we can do this safely. There are all kinds of caveats in
the MS documentation. And it's only useful when Emacs aborts, not
when, e.g., it hits a breakpoint.
Why is it a pain to run Emacs under GDB at all times? That way we
don't install the hook, and the problem doesn't happen in the first
place.
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Kien Nguyen, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Kien Nguyen, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Kien Nguyen, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Pip Cet, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Kien Nguyen, 2024/09/01
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/02
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Kien Nguyen, 2024/09/03
- Re: MPS: Win64 testers?, Pip Cet, 2024/09/03