Re: License Notice for ELPA packages

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> So historically we have accepted both "is part of GNU Emacs" and "is NOT
>>> part of GNU Emacs".  IMO the better choice is to say neither.
>> Thanks for your response.  I installed this notice for AUCTeX files:
>> ;; This file is part of AUCTeX.
> While not wrong, I believe that this might confuse people in the future,
> just like you were confused about the different instances of "is part"
> and "is NOT part" found in different packages.  Some might interpret
> this as "what if any is the closest GNU project the file belongs to?".

I don't understand: why would they restrict themselves to "GNU projects"?


        Stefan