[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: packages submissions : ob-sql-session and org-blog
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: packages submissions : ob-sql-session and org-blog |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2024 07:47:36 +0000 |
Phil Estival <pe@7d.nz> writes:
> * [2024-09-11 09:24] Philip Kaludercic:
>> Phil Estival <pe@7d.nz> writes:
>>> Hello
> on ob-sql-session
>>> that I'd like to submit to ELPA, with
>>> the advise and approval of emacs-devel.
>> Just to be sure, you mean GNU ELPA (not NonGNU ELPA), right?
>
> I think so. The ownership transferred to the FSF and a copyright
> assignment.
Right.
> One word about the license notice: I'm in agreement
> with Stephan's opinion:
>> historically we have accepted both "is part of GNU Emacs" and "is NOT
>> part of GNU Emacs". IMO the better choice is to say neither.
Yeah, that is fine.
> on org-blog :
>> Hmm, I don't know if we have any literate programs on ELPA yet. If you
>> prefer that style of development, that is fair, but what I would suggest
>> would be to add a Makefile and extract the elisp at "compile-time", or
>> in the case of ELPA when the tarball is being built.
>> skimming through the .org file (which most certainly should /not/ be
>> the README btw) the code could also use some cleaning
>> up, at least if the intention is to publish it as a generic package.
>
>> The functions don't seem to adhere to a specific conventional namespace,
>
>> I have my doubts as to how much sense it would make to try and convert
>> this personal code into a proper package, instead of starting over again :/
>
> Understood. I'll be back with something cleaner, reconsider
> where it can rely on the existing structures, and seek more advice
> on the Org mailing list. Thanks for everything.
Thank you, and I hope my words were not too harsh. I am not an
org-mode expert, perhaps the people on the org-mode mailing list might
have some comments and ideas on how to best implement your idea.
> Phil
>
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin