[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion)
From: |
Christopher Howard |
Subject: |
Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:57:29 -0800 |
Hi, *chunk-edit* seemed like a very appealing idea to me, so I tried it right
away this morning. My use case was editing two chunks of elisp code that were
very far apart in a single file.
However, for me the fatal issue is that chunk-edit-mode replaces the active
major mode, so that indentation, and presumably other things, are not handled
properly. I think any approach to this has to deal with that properly —
maintaining the correct major mode in chunk.
It think my particular use case could instead be handled with zones.el. Not
sure about the case where you have, e.g., someone wanting to edit a region in a
C header file and a region in a C source file, in the same buffer. I suppose
that might be useful, e.g., when using search and replace macros and such like.
--
Christopher Howard
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), (continued)
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Suhail Singh, 2024/10/17
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/17
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Suhail Singh, 2024/10/17
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Eli Zaretskii, 2024/10/17
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Vladimir Kazanov, 2024/10/18
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), Suhail Singh, 2024/10/19
- Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion), James Thomas, 2024/10/17
Re: Buffers with buffers (transclusion),
Christopher Howard <=