[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default lexical-binding to t
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default lexical-binding to t |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2024 22:46:53 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> What bothers me is how do I know whether a given Lisp file of mine
> will have problems under lexical-binding. Do we have any tools which
> will help me determine that?
I don't know of any easy way to do that. It requires software to
analyze the code and deduce how it will function.
However, to determine automatically _some_ value of `lexical-binding'
that will fowk in that file is easy: use nil.
In many cases, t would work too, but determining whether it would
calls for some intelligence.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, (continued)
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sean Whitton, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jim Porter, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, John Yates, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Christopher Howard, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Suhail Singh, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/08
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08