[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default lexical-binding to t
From: |
Joost Kremers |
Subject: |
Re: Default lexical-binding to t |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2024 09:07:28 +0100 |
Hi Eli,
> Are the time, energy, and
> massive efforts I invested (and am still investing) in bidirectional
> editing support worth it? I don't know; there are days when I think
> it was all a terrible waste.
FWIW, I was extremely grateful for that work. At the time bidi support
became available in Emacs, I needed to work with Arabic texts quite a bit,
and it was great that I could do that from the comfort of my favourite
editor.
--
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, (continued)
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Joost Kremers, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/09
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t,
Joost Kremers <=
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, tomas, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Andrea Corallo, 2024/11/07