Re: Default lexical-binding to t

[tomas]

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>
> > Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 09:07:28 +0100
> > 
> > Hi Eli,
> > > Are the time, energy, and
> > > massive efforts I invested (and am still investing) in bidirectional
> > > editing support worth it?  I don't know; there are days when I think
> > > it was all a terrible waste.
> > 
> > FWIW, I was extremely grateful for that work. At the time bidi support
> > became available in Emacs, I needed to work with Arabic texts quite a bit,
> > and it was great that I could do that from the comfort of my favourite
> > editor.
> 
> Thanks.  But there are other voices in this regard.

Count me also on the "thank you!" side.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature