[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default lexical-binding to t
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Default lexical-binding to t |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Nov 2024 20:51:45 +0200 |
> From: Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>
> Cc: acorallo@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:28:55 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >> From: Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>
> >> Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 10:53:23 -0500
> >>
> >> Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:
> >> >
> >> > Most people load files without first fisiting them, so I still
> >> > think the load time warning idea has some advantage.
> >>
> >> They _really_ shouldn't do that, though... :)
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Isn't it general considered a bad idea to run arbitrary code without
> taking a look first?
Don't you do that with all the Lisp files that come with Emacs?
- Re: lexical-binding in paredit, (continued)
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Andrea Corallo, 2024/11/03
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Andrea Corallo, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sebastián Monía, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sebastián Monía, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Joost Kremers, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sebastián Monía, 2024/11/08
- RE: [External] : Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Drew Adams, 2024/11/08
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/11
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/04