[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10 |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Dec 2024 09:13:36 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> As 32-bit systems go away, it will become harder to write Lisp code that
>> works correctly in !WIDE_EMACS_INT 32-bit builds, so we may well have to
>> make WIDE_EMACS_INT the default at some point.
>
> If you are trying to convince me to switch to 64-bit development
> environment, you are wasting your time. I have my very good reasons,
> and don't plan on doing so any time soon.
>
> And 64-but Windows supports 32-bit code perfectly for my needs.
Moreover, 32-bit Android systems remain widespread, and many people
build 32-bit Emacs binaries for more optimal memory utilization. In
fact Android OEMs sometimes install 32-bit operating systems on 64-bit
capable hardware to optimize memory usage, and consequently, speaking of
the demise of 32-bit configurations is a pointless exercise. And armv7
is not nearly so register-starved as 32-bit x86...
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, (continued)
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Paul Eggert, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/09
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/17
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/18
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Pip Cet, 2024/12/08
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10,
Po Lu <=
- Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/08
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/08
Re: pdumper on Solaris 10, Po Lu, 2024/12/08