emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vtable for eww-bookmarks
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 13:04:53 +0200

Ping!  Can we please make some progress here?

> From: Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com>
> Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>,  emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
>   Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:37:23 -0500
> 
> Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:
> >  About regenerating the elements and not being able to use EQ: is that
> >  because the original bookmark objects are not being used as-is?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> >  If so, could we address that?
> 
> We could add the order in the file format. Or number the items when we
> read them. Then use the object including the number to track it all.
> But when change the "order" number associated with a row, then it won't
> be eq/equal anymore, anyway.
> 
> Maybe better: vtable provides a mechanism to have a printer function
> called on each row. Then the objects stay the same, in the `eq' sense,
> and we can keep the counter for order outside the row, as part of the
> printer/"formatter" (in vtable parlance).
> 
> To consider: then we would call a function for each printed row vs
> calling it once to generate the list in one go. Plus the code to update
> the items order number when removing and inserting each one.
> 
> Of course the real answer on which one is "faster" or "leaner" needs a
> benchmark. For 90% of cases the amount of bookmarks won't be more than a
> couple dozen, so I don't think it will matter.
> 
> I would leave it as-is on the grounds of (add less code + the
> speed/memory difference is small)(1). But as usual, if there's
> consensus that we rather do the outlined above instead, I'll do it.
> 
> 
> (1) like I said, no benchmark, so "_I assume_ the difference is small"
> 
> >  On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 09:25 Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >  Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com> writes:
> >
> >  > Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com> writes:
> >  > Hi all,
> >  > Attached a patch with "Order" and validation for this sort before
> >  > kill/yank.
> >  > As always, open to feedback.
> >
> >  Updated the patch to include the changelog :)
> >
> >  -- 
> >  Sebastián Monía
> >  https://site.sebasmonia.com/
> >
> 
> -- 
> Sebastián Monía
> https://site.sebasmonia.com/
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]