Re: is there a diff-unite-hunks or similar?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "SW" == Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:

> Hello,
> On Sun 15 Jun 2025 at 12:02pm +02, Uwe Brauer wrote:

>> But the inverse functionality to unify two subsequent hunks.
>> 
>> Anybody knows about such a function, or is it planned?

> We don't have a function to do this.  If someone can figure out how to
> implement it in a semantics-preserving way, it would be a good addition.


Good and bad news. Good I played around with it (looking at diff-split-hunk) 
and it seems that I unified one hunk with the next one.

But when I tried to commit the whole thing I always obtained HUNK rejected or 
something like this.

So I presume this is really hairy and somebody who understands the code much 
better should give it a try, if he/she feels like it.


-- 
I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. 
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature