emacs-elpa-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[elpa] externals/dash 81b15c5 006/316: Fix: The upcoming breaking change


From: ELPA Syncer
Subject: [elpa] externals/dash 81b15c5 006/316: Fix: The upcoming breaking change is 3.0, not 2.0
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:57:13 -0500 (EST)

branch: externals/dash
commit 81b15c58656c0a814c081fe4da1d9ec711feb289
Author: Magnar Sveen <magnars@gmail.com>
Commit: Magnar Sveen <magnars@gmail.com>

    Fix: The upcoming breaking change is 3.0, not 2.0
---
 README.md          | 2 +-
 dash.el            | 2 +-
 readme-template.md | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index f87124f..b3c2179 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ To get function combinators:
 
 - For backward compatibility reasons `-zip` return a cons-cell instead of a 
list
   with two elements when called on two lists. This is a clunky API, and in an
-  upcoming 2.0 release of Dash it will always return a list. If you rely on the
+  upcoming 3.0 release of Dash it will always return a list. If you rely on the
   cons-cell return value, use `-zip-pair` instead.
 
 ## Syntax highlighting of dash functions
diff --git a/dash.el b/dash.el
index 9a27964..c70b3cc 100644
--- a/dash.el
+++ b/dash.el
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 ;; See documentation on https://github.com/magnars/dash.el#functions
 ;;
 ;; **Please note** The lexical binding in this file is not utilised at the
-;; moment. We will take full advantage of lexical binding in an upcoming 2.0
+;; moment. We will take full advantage of lexical binding in an upcoming 3.0
 ;; release of Dash. In the meantime, we've added the pragma to avoid a bug that
 ;; you can read more about in https://github.com/magnars/dash.el/issues/130.
 ;;
diff --git a/readme-template.md b/readme-template.md
index 95a7b37..4cff273 100644
--- a/readme-template.md
+++ b/readme-template.md
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ To get function combinators:
 
 - For backward compatibility reasons `-zip` return a cons-cell instead of a 
list
   with two elements when called on two lists. This is a clunky API, and in an
-  upcoming 2.0 release of Dash it will always return a list. If you rely on the
+  upcoming 3.0 release of Dash it will always return a list. If you rely on the
   cons-cell return value, use `-zip-pair` instead.
 
 ## Syntax highlighting of dash functions



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]