[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[elpa] externals/coterm e0a512d 2/3: Minor grammar fixes
From: |
ELPA Syncer |
Subject: |
[elpa] externals/coterm e0a512d 2/3: Minor grammar fixes |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:57:21 -0500 (EST) |
branch: externals/coterm
commit e0a512ddf2941d171583f8974023233d76aeff49
Author: Miha Rihtaršič <miha@kamnitnik.top>
Commit: Miha Rihtaršič <miha@kamnitnik.top>
Minor grammar fixes
---
coterm.el | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/coterm.el b/coterm.el
index 5a56ac2..c9a0c8d 100644
--- a/coterm.el
+++ b/coterm.el
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
;;
;; To install coterm, type M-x package-install RET coterm RET
;;
-;; It is best to add the following elisp snippet to you Emacs init file, to
+;; It is best to add the following elisp snippet to your Emacs init file, to
;; enable `coterm-mode' automatically on startup:
;;
;; (coterm-mode)
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ is the process mark."
;; This is essentially a re-implementation of term.el's terminal emulation. I
;; could have simply reused functions from term.el but that would have been
;; unsatisfactory in my opinion. That is mostly due to the fact that term.el's
-;; terminal emulation inserts a lot of redundant trailing whitespace end empty
+;; terminal emulation inserts a lot of redundant trailing whitespace and empty
;; lines, which I believe is very distracting for ordinary comint usage.
;;
;; Terminal emulation is coordinate based, for example, "move cursor to row 11
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ is the process mark."
;; buffer because the specified line is currently too short or there aren't
;; enough lines in the buffer. term.el automatically inserts empty lines and
;; spaces in order to move point to a specified coordinate position. This
-;; results in trailing whitespace.
+;; often results in trailing whitespace.
;;
;; coterm takes a different approach. Instead of moving point, the current
;; terminal cursor coordinates are kept in the variables `coterm--t-row' and
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ is the process mark."
;; terminal emulation isn't fully accurate for long lines. Up to now, "less"
;; was the only program I've encountered that relies on accurate line wrapping,
;; so a workaround aimed at "less" specifically was implemented (search for the
-;; term "less" in the function `coterm--t-emulate-terminal'.
+;; term "less" in the function `coterm--t-emulate-terminal').
(defconst coterm--t-control-seq-regexp
;; Differences from `term-control-seq-regexp':
@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ buffer and the scrolling region must cover the whole
screen."
(setq coterm--t-col column)))
(defun coterm--t-adjust-from-pmark (pos)
- "Point `coterm--t-row' and `coterm--t-col' POS."
+ "Make `coterm--t-row' and `coterm--t-col' point to POS."
(coterm--t-normalize-home-offset)
(goto-char pos)
(setq coterm--t-col (current-column))