[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[elpa] externals/vertico 736f3c2 2/2: README: Improve documentation
From: |
ELPA Syncer |
Subject: |
[elpa] externals/vertico 736f3c2 2/2: README: Improve documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:57:49 -0500 (EST) |
branch: externals/vertico
commit 736f3c2bd372275b9bcacdbc24ddc2a865de85b5
Author: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
Commit: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
README: Improve documentation
---
README.org | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.org b/README.org
index e1331e9..9ed7b8d 100644
--- a/README.org
+++ b/README.org
@@ -381,10 +381,9 @@ packages a try and judge for yourself.
prioritize ~basic~ before ~orderless:~
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
- ;; Alternative 1: Configure globally
- (setq completion-styles '(basic orderless))
-
- ;; Alternative 2: Locally only for the problematic command
+ ;; Alternative 1: Use the basic completion style
+ (setq org-refile-use-outline-path 'file
+ org-outline-path-complete-in-steps t)
(advice-add #'org-olpath-completing-read :around
(lambda (&rest args)
(minibuffer-with-setup-hook
@@ -392,12 +391,14 @@ packages a try and judge for yourself.
(apply args))))
#+end_src
- However I recommend to disable the outline path completion in steps. The
- completion on the full path is faster since the input string matches
directly
- against the full path, which is particularily useful with Orderless.
+ Alternatively you may want to disable the outline path completion in steps.
+ The completion on the full path can be quicker since the input string
matches
+ directly against substrings of the full path, which is particularily useful
+ with Orderless. However the list of possible completions becomes much more
+ cluttered.
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
- ;; Alternative 3 (Recommended)
+ ;; Alternative 2: Complete full paths
(setq org-refile-use-outline-path 'file
org-outline-path-complete-in-steps nil)
#+end_src