[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: counter-intuitive key bindings

From: Leo
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: counter-intuitive key bindings
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:57:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110007 Emacs/23.0.0 (20070727) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux)

On 2007-08-09 06:05 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> In this case, I feel there should a consistent definition of key
>> bindings. One excellent example is vc, it is just so easy to remember.
> What do you mean with "consistent definition of key bindings".
>> I have been an regular user of org, and I have already forgotten that
>> S-up/down does priority change after one month's break.
> I have been trying very hard to make the key bindings as logical
> as possible - but there is a huge amount of commands in org,
> and many keys are needed.
> That said, the S-up/down for priorities does leas to a couple
> of inconsistencies, in particular between agenda and org-mode buffers.
> - Carsten

I know it is difficult to come up with good key bindings for so many
commands that org-mode has. That's why I gave the example of vc, which
has extremely excellent key bindings. I would never have to learn them a
second time. I hope someone can come up with something similar for org.

Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)

         Gnus is one component of the Emacs operating system.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]