|
| From: | Carsten Dominik |
| Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09 |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:45:49 +0200 |
On Sep 19, 2007, at 2:49, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:Priority cycling is a bit odd. When I use M-n to cycle, it turns from #C-> nil-> #C-> nil, and M-p will be #A->nil->#A->nil.I did it like this on purpose, because I wanted S-up to immediately increase the priority.I would vote for something very simple: <S-up> increases priority, <S-down> decreases priority. <S-up> : nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] [...] <S-down> : nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] [...]
How about this:
S-up : nil -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] ...
S-sown : nil -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] ...
So the first keypress will really get you up/down from the default
priority, and after that it is normal cycling. Maybe it is clearer
in an example with 5 priorities, A..E, default C:
S-up : nil -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#E] -> [#D] ->
[#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#E] ...
Comments?
- Carsten
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |