[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 26, Issue 34

From: address@hidden
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 26, Issue 34
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:04:35 +0100

Hi Carsten,

I thought I'd jump in with my 2 pennies:

http:foo.html is a bad habit because (just perhaps) the HTML file isn't accessed by http, and then the internal links break. So if the generated HTML documents are stored locally (I fantasize that someday my PSP will be able to do this) and accessed using a file:// link, the HTML spec requires the browser to ditch the protocol and use the specified one, which won't work if my PSP is offline.


On 2008-04-13 Sun, at 17:54:33 +0200, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden > wrote:

Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:33 +0200
From: Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] export to html and relative links:
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:

I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
author a relative URL is a bad idea.

Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea?
Educate me!  What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ??????

- Carsten

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]