[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] outline-agenda sorting consistency
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] outline-agenda sorting consistency |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:18:42 -0700 |
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 04:53, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> you can now et faces for each priority, using the variable
> org-priority-faces, in a way similar to the todo-keyword faces,
> and the tag faces. Just note that the car in this alist must be
> a character, not a string.
This is much better, thanks. Makes it easier to distinguish
and I can use C now.
>> Here is how I might do it, were the facility to exist:
>>
>> - done-ish and unimportant stuff at the bottom, important
>> stuff at the top, and uncategorized nodes (i.e. blank
>> todo state, no priority, no urgency) in the middle.
>> - alphabetical order for nodes with the same weight
>> - to calculate the weight of a node:
>> 1) priority a is worth +1000
>> 2) urgent tag gets +1000
>> 3) now tag gets +500
>> 4) todo-ish states (todo, next) get +100
>> 5) /blank todo state/ gets 0
>> 6) zombie states (wait etc.) get -100
>> 7) someday tag gets -500
>> 8) priority c gets -1000
>> 9) done-ish states (done, moot) get -3000
>> - example: an urgent todo would have a weight of 1100.
>> when it is marked done, it would have a weight of -2000.
>
> Outline sorting can be done using a user-defined function,
> so in principle this should be possible..... It is on my list,
> but not with high priority....
OK. Thanks for thinking about it.
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and *grossly*
corrupting science.
http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm