[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Nick Dokos: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode i
Nick Dokos: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
Mon, 04 May 2009 12:41:44 -0400
[D'oh: I replied to Carsten only - sorry about that.]
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 16:27:15 -0400
From: Nick Dokos <address@hidden>
To: Carsten Dominik <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Make
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
> > emacs
> > -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
> am not even sure about Emacs 22.
emacs-22 groks -Q (or in long form: --no-init-file --no-site-file
- --no-splash). xemacs21 seems to use long form options with a single
dash: -no-init-file (== -q) and -no-site-file.
The thing is that (with git) it's easy to make such changes locally,
while waiting (perhaps for ever !-) for upstream: have a local branch
with a few changes that are specific to the local setup and rebase
after a pull.
 According to an online manpage: http://linux.die.net/man/1/xemacs
------- End of Forwarded Message
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- Nick Dokos: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile,
Nick Dokos <=