[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:08:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
Scot Becker wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> No apologies needed. A good explanation like yours is a valuable
> thing to have sitting in the mailing list archive (and perhaps even in
> a more formal spot, in the Worg article: "Academic writing with Org,"
> which I will someday help you write.)
>
> Scot
>
Hi Scot,
you are completely right. But there was not delivered a serious apology.
That's been pure rhetoric formula out of courtesy.
At least that's what I understood not being a native english speaker.
Seeing the danger of raising flame-wars,
which we have seen at several occasions, consider that rather a
recommendable style.
Cheers
Andreas
- [Orgmode] footnote renumber bug, Andreas Roehler, 2009/07/02
- Re: [Orgmode] footnote renumber bug, Karl Maihofer, 2009/07/02
- Re: [Orgmode] footnote renumber bug, Andreas Röhler, 2009/07/02
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Matthew Lundin, 2009/07/02
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Matthew Lundin, 2009/07/02
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Andreas Röhler, 2009/07/02
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Matthew Lundin, 2009/07/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Scot Becker, 2009/07/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug,
Andreas Röhler <=
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Paul R, 2009/07/03
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Andreas Röhler, 2009/07/03
- [Orgmode] Re: footnote renumber bug, Matthew Lundin, 2009/07/03
Re: [Orgmode] footnote renumber bug, Carsten Dominik, 2009/07/03