[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] dangling clock message might be incomprehensible to a few

From: Daniel Clemente
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] dangling clock message might be incomprehensible to a few users
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:35:26 +0100

I also think that interface is difficult to understand. Maybe we
should detail the texts for an easy one.
It should express the actions in words that match the user's
intention. For instance,
- account some minutes to that task
- set end time for that task
- discard that partial clocking
- do nothing and leave dangling clock


On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
> I'd like to chime in here:
> Samuel Wales schrieb:
>> Here is part of it:
>>                      " [(kK)p (sS)ub (C)ncl (i)gn]? ")
>> Some users might ask:
>> kp=?  Keep?  Keep what?
>> sub=subtract what from what?
>> cncl=cancel command?  Why "C" only?
>> ign=ignore what?   Why "i" only?
> ---Zitatende---
> I'd also appreciate it if there was an option to give a time when the
> clock should end, instead of just a number of minutes to keep. It's
> easier for me to figure out when I ended work on the task, than how
> minutes I spent on it.
> Also I think the last clock entry isn't always displayed, which makes
> it even harder to figure out how to answer the 'k' question.
> --
>        Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs <address@hidden>
>                             TauPan on Ircnet and Freenode ;)
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]