[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Re: need detailed instructions for submitting the patch

From: David Maus
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: need detailed instructions for submitting the patch
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:39:37 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Goj┼Ź) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.2 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

Dan Davison wrote:
>Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:

>> Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> > For example, I have a modified file org-whatever.el. What commands
>>> > must I run?
>>> Please follow the instructions on Worg and let us know what is not
>>> crystal-clear -- that will help improve the doc if necessary.
>> I think Dmitry is asking for the git commands and I'm not sure those
>> are described anywhere on Worg.
>> Something like this perhaps:
>>          # create a topic branch to deal with a specific topic: use
>>          # a descriptive name!
>>          git checkout -b topic-branch-foo master
>>          <make changes specific to topic>
>>          git commit -a
>>          git format-patch
>>          <send out patch in email to appropriate mailing list>

>One point I'm not yet clear on:

>For the patchwork system, what methods of inclusion of patch in email
>are acceptable?

>+ attachment type text/plain?

>+ attachment type text/x-diff?

>+ attach using C-c C-a in gnus but choose "inline" rather than as
>  "attachment"?

"inline" or "attachment" is irrelevant: It is just a hint to a
displaying MUA how to visualize an attachment (Cf. RFC2183: The
Content-Disposition Header Field).

>+ paste inline?
Should work.

>+ paste inline with special gnus separators --8<-- ?

>does it matter how the patch file is named?
AFAIK it doesn't.

>Also, what requirements are there on how to *reply* so that your message
>gets lumped by patchwork into the same patch item, rather than creating
>a new item? Can the subject line be modified?

AFAIK the subject line doesn't matter because what identifies a
message (for patchtracker and in general) is the message-id header
field.  So it should be a proper reply to the message: Using the
message-id header field in the in-reply-to and references header

  -- David
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber.... address@hidden
Email..... address@hidden

Attachment: pgpSrkxjO7znj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]