[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:56:30 -0500 |
Andrew J. Korty <address@hidden> wrote:
> Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is
> definitely superfluous. Who has a mail client that can't filter on
> the List-Id field?
>
It may be superfluous for some (all?) mail clients, but it is not
supefluous for *me*. Some duplication/supefluity is a *necessary* part
of effective human communication. Of course, you can argue that *this*
supefluity is *really* supefluous, but I'd disagree :-)
Nick
- [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Torsten Wagner, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Andrew J. Korty, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Nick Dokos, 2010/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, William Gardella, 2010/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, William Gardella, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Torsten Wagner, 2010/12/18